Historical epidemiology and global health history / Epidemiologia histórica e história global da saúde

Abstract The subdiscipline of historical epidemiology holds the promise of creating a more robust and more nuanced foundation for global public health decision-making by deepening the empirical record from which we draw lessons about past interventions. This essay draws upon historical epidemiological research on three global public health campaigns to illustrate this promise: the Rockefeller Foundation's efforts to control hookworm disease (1909-c.1930), the World Health Organization's pilot projects for malaria eradication in tropical Africa (1950s-1960s), and the international efforts to shut down the transmission of Ebola virus disease during outbreaks in tropical Africa (1974-2019).

Resumo A subdisciplina epidemiologia histórica se propõe a criar um alicerce robusto e refinado para o processo de tomada de decisões em saúde pública global, aprofundando registros empíricos que nos ensinam sobre intervenções passadas. Este artigo se baseia na pesquisa epidemiológica histórica de três campanhas globais de saúde pública para ilustrar essa proposta: os esforços da Fundação Rockefeller para controle da ancilostomose (1909-c.1930), os projetos-piloto da Organização Mundial da Saúde para erradicação da malária na África tropical (décadas de 1950-1960), e os esforços internacionais de interrupção da transmissão do vírus Ebola durante surtos na África tropical (1974-2019).

Ebola virus – from neglected threat to global emergency state / Vírus ébola – de ameaça negligenciada ao estado de emergência global

SUMMARY Objective: This review aims to update knowledge about Ebola virus disease (EVD) and recent advances in its diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Method: A literature review was performed using the following databases: ISI Web of Knowledge, PubMed, IRIS, Scopus and the websites of the CDC and the WHO. Additionally, we have included articles and reports referenced in the basic literature search, and news that were considered relevant. Results: The Ebola virus, endemic in some parts of Africa, is responsible for a severe form of hemorrhagic fever in humans; bats are probably its natural reservoir. It is an extremely virulent virus and easily transmitted by bodily fluids. EVD's complex pathophysiology, characterized by immunosuppression as well as stimulation of an intense inflammatory response, results in a syndrome similar to septic shock. The diagnosis is difficult due to the initial symptoms that mimic other diseases. Despite the high mortality rates that can amount to 90%, a prophylaxis (chemical or vaccine) or effective treatment does not exist. Two vaccines and experimental therapies are being developed for the prevention and treatment of EVD. Conclusion: Although the virus is known for about 40 years, the lack of knowledge obtained and the disinterest of government authorities in the countries involved justify the state of emergency currently exists regarding this infectious agent. Only the coordination of multiple entities and the effective commitment of the international community will facilitate the control and effective prevention of EVD.

RESUMO Objetivo: esta revisão tem como objetivo atualizar os conhecimentos sobre a doença do vírus ébola (DVE) e sobre os recentes avanços nos métodos de diagnóstico, tratamento e prevenção. Método: foi realizada uma revisão de literatura, utilizando as seguintes bases de dados: ISI Web of Knowledge, PubMed, IRIS, Scopus e os sites do Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) e da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Adicionalmente, foram incluídos artigos e relatórios referenciados na pesquisa bibliográfica de base e notícias consideradas relevantes. Resultados: o vírus ébola, endêmico de algumas regiões da África, é responsável por uma forma grave de febre hemorrágica no homem, e os morcegos são provavelmente o seu reservatório natural. É um vírus extremamente virulento e de fácil transmissão pelos fluidos corporais. A complexa fisiopatologia da doença, caracterizada pela imunossupressão e pelo estímulo a uma intensa resposta inflamatória, resulta em uma síndrome semelhante ao choque séptico. O seu diagnóstico é difícil, por causa da sintomatologia inicial, que mimetiza outras doenças. Apesar das altas taxas de mortalidade, que podem alcançar os 90%, não existe profilaxia (química ou vacinal) ou tratamento eficaz. Encontram-se em desenvolvimento duas vacinas e terapias experimentais para a prevenção e o tratamento da DVE. Conclusão: apesar de ser um vírus conhecido há cerca de 40 anos, o escasso conhecimento obtido e o desinteresse das entidades governamentais de países envolvidos justificam o estado de emergência que se vive atualmente em relação a esse agente infeccioso. A coordenação por múltiplas entidades e o empenho efetivo da comunidade internacional facilitarão o seu controle e a prevenção eficaz.

Ebola hemorrhagic fever outbreaks: strategies for effective epidemic management, containment and control

Ebola hemorrhagic fever, caused by the highly virulent RNA virus of the filoviridae family, has become one of the world's most feared pathogens. The virus induces acute fever and death, often associated with hemorrhagic symptoms in up to 90% of infected patients. The known sub-types of the virus are Zaire, Sudan, Taï Forest, Bundibugyo and Reston Ebola viruses. In the past, outbreaks were limited to the East and Central African tropical belt with the exception of Ebola Reston outbreaks that occurred in animal facilities in the Philippines, USA and Italy. The on-going outbreak in West Africa that is causing numerous deaths and severe socio-economic challenges has resulted in widespread anxiety globally. This panic may be attributed to the intense media interest, the rapid spread of the virus to other countries like United States and Spain, and moreover, to the absence of an approved treatment or vaccine. Informed by this widespread fear and anxiety, we analyzed the commonly used strategies to manage and control Ebola outbreaks and proposed new approaches that could improve epidemic management and control during future outbreaks. We based our recommendations on epidemic management practices employed during recent outbreaks in East, Central and West Africa, and synthesis of peer-reviewed publications as well as published "field" information from individuals and organizations recently involved in the management of Ebola epidemics. The current epidemic management approaches are largely "reactive", with containment efforts aimed at halting spread of existing outbreaks. We recommend that for better outcomes, in addition to "reactive" interventions, "pre-emptive" strategies also need to be instituted. We conclude that emphasizing both "reactive" and "pre-emptive" strategies is more likely to lead to better epidemic preparedness and response at individual, community, institutional, and government levels, resulting in timely containment of future Ebola outbreaks.